Race Number collections: PLEASE, PLEASE!!!
#81
Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:48
#82
Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:57
Powered by CARBON FIBER and CAMPAGNOLO
#83
Posted 15 February 2010 - 11:51
Stay off the brakes, they only slow you down
Follow me - I'm right behind you
#84
Posted 16 February 2010 - 08:28
#85
Posted 16 February 2010 - 08:40
Quote
We're all in the same boat
These number pick-ups are starting to give me SERIAAS headaches!!
Vliegen zonder vleugels, allemaal door jou.
#86
Posted 16 February 2010 - 08:49
Quote
Quote
We're all in the same boat
These number pick-ups are starting to give me SERIAAS headaches!!
#87
Posted 16 February 2010 - 01:15
Eish, I miss the goodybags.
#88
Posted 16 February 2010 - 02:06
#89
Posted 17 February 2010 - 03:08
Quote
Quote
Quote
These number pick-ups are starting to give me SERIAAS headaches!!Thanks shadowchaser-d, but my wife will collect my number for SAs. It's the R4S number collection that's going to be a hassle!
Vliegen zonder vleugels, allemaal door jou.
#90
Posted 23 February 2010 - 10:45
Quote
#91
Posted 23 February 2010 - 10:54
I've also got paper & a printer so I can also print the dam thing, it doesn't need to be on any special paper.
Powered by CARBON FIBER and CAMPAGNOLO
#92
Posted 23 February 2010 - 11:33
Quote
Stay off the brakes, they only slow you down
Follow me - I'm right behind you
#93
Posted 23 August 2010 - 10:30
We are 6 months down the line and still no one is clever enough to think of a sollution.
In the mean time Thousands if not MILLIONS of R are wasted on picking up a piece of paper that can be generated at home!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#94
Posted 23 August 2010 - 10:32
Trubie, on 05 February 2010 - 07:19 , said:
<DIV>What has happened to the talk about this year's racing according to seeding and no longer in age cats?</DIV>
<DIV>Or was it just talk?</DIV>
<DIV>Â </DIV>
<DIV>Â </DIV>
Well.....6 months down the line and it is still only TALK. The only thing CSA has done thus far is TALK!!!
#95
Posted 23 August 2010 - 11:01
Andrew mclean, on 05 February 2010 - 08:45 , said:
I agree with you that the current system of driving to Cycle Lab, does not work!!!
I have said this before.
Traffic is insane and everyone is timed deprived.
It is not feasible to have race pick up at multiple venues on the same day. [For many logistical reasons]
We do always try get organizers to have at least 2 possibly 3 pick up options, at different venues.
So.....6 months later Hello Andrew.
Multiple venues are still a pain as I need to go grovel in front of the boss asking 2 hours away from work.
How about mailing my number to me?
Andrew mclean, on 05 February 2010 - 08:45 , said:
In fact we often collect numbers for cyclists who simply cannot make it to pick up.
We have been discussing alternatives with event organizers and role players,
For a while, however as you can see from the last 7 pages of debate it is not so simple;
Agreed.....morning of the race not the solution.
How about mailing it to me?
Andrew mclean, on 05 February 2010 - 08:45 , said:
No particular order here are a few issues to be considered;
-Sponsors want their logos on the numbers Mail my number in PDF format with all the logos on
-Numbers cannot be printed on normal paper [paper tears/rain issues etc] Give me the paper you want it on. I'll pay for it. 20 pages per year should be less than ONE drive through to Jhb.
-Event organizers need Pre entries to plan-Coke, medals, cash flow etc. Especially big events. E.G. Hyper to Hyper would have catered for 8000 cyclists but only 2000 arrived on the day, this would be a financial disaster. So let's do pre entries. No issues there. Once I am entered, mail me my number.
-Seeding changes weekly. So this needs to be considered with a one number system. Agreed. So mail me my number.
-In SA, more so than the rest of the world, cyclists look for loopholes to buck the system. Printing multiple numbers for mates, not paying and riding etc. They do it now anyway. Will mailing the number make it easier....maybe....it takes out the "Scanning" as part of the process of copying. Will it stop cheats from cheating? Not. Just DQ them should the chip not be registered for the entered event?!!!
-Event organizers [mostly volunteers] cannot cope with thousands of people on race morning. Agreed as above.
-A lot of the solutions require very good fencing [security] for start batches or seeding groups, something like Argus, however, Costs again are a problem for event organizers.
Multiple scanning mats at the start costs lots of money. OK.......so then let us NOT do that. Again...If you want to cheat, you will cheat. No system will stop that!!! Just give a DQ after the ride. And then start black listing people after say 3 DQ's or something......
I am sure there are a whole host of other issues I have overlooked.
What works in other provinces will not necessarily work for us up, largely die to the big numbers. [Maybe a lot of the systems implemented up here in the past have worked well]
Sad to say but I think that there is not ONE race except for the Argus and the 94.7 that counts 1000+ riders per event. Not one. Number have been declining and leaders like yourself needs to realise that something needs to be done if you want us to continue racing......
Andrew mclean, on 05 February 2010 - 08:45 , said:
However if were so simple it would have already happened.
Be part of the solution and give us constructive ideas to help find a solution that works for everyone [Cyclists, Sponsors, officials, admin staff, volunteers]
Just remember you need to be able to think of the solution, not only from a cyclist�s perspective.
So....I have this idea.
Let's mail the numbers in PDF format to the riders. They print it together with a little card that needs to be handed in at the start line.....like the Argus and the 94.7.
There is NO cost to the organiser....they already have people standing at the gates to check numbers.
No paper cost to organisers. No cable ties. No safety pins. No people and logistics the week before the race for number collections....
The rider needs to hand in his card and print his number for every race. If I (as a rider) choose to cheat and generate my own number I will do so irrespective of the number being mailed or me having to scan it in myself. I will get DQ'ed if my chip is not registered for the even. Same as with the current system.....
What does the organiser have to loose in a scenario like this?????
Andrew Mclean. Just a spider on the wall watching.....
#96
Posted 23 August 2010 - 11:08












