Jump to content


Let's see those Morewoods...


  • Please log in to reply
395 replies to this topic Post Order

#305 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:17

The Shova:

Picture.jpg

#306 patches

patches

    Tea Lady

  • Members
  • 5 706 posts
  • LocationKitchen

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:31

:thumbup:  Chubba!

Either a Shova or an Mbuzi will be the next morewood I plan on adding to my stable
"black rims are for poor people"
  - Meredith & van Luipen

#307 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:43

View Postpatches, on 02 September 2011 - 11:14 , said:

Awesome rides dude. Should also take a head on head pick with the Zula.

#308 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:44

View Postpatches, on 02 September 2011 - 11:31 , said:

:thumbup:  Chubba!

Either a Shova or an Mbuzi will be the next morewood I plan on adding to my stable
There was an Mbuzi for sale in the classifieds, small tho.

#309 XTC1

XTC1

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 1 390 posts
  • LocationSSW / Stellenbosch

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:47

Chubba how about a ride report and how are you enjoying that bike compared to the Zula?

#310 banna

banna

    Pancy Ass

  • Members
  • 935 posts
  • LocationDurbanville

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:47

View PostChubba, on 02 September 2011 - 11:17 , said:

The Shova:

Attachment Picture.jpg

Chubba any idea what your Shova weighs? They are just the perfect trail machines.

#311 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:52

View Postbanna, on 02 September 2011 - 11:47 , said:

Chubba any idea what your Shova weighs? They are just the perfect trail machines.
I weighed it on a bathroom scale - and it came in at a tad over 13kgs.

#312 RossW

RossW

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 715 posts
  • LocationJohannesburg

Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:26

That's a really good weight for a Shova.  :thumbup:
Strava Stats from Veloviewer.com
2010 Santa Cruz Blur LT
2008 Santa Cruz Superlight
2011 Niner E.M.D

#313 banna

banna

    Pancy Ass

  • Members
  • 935 posts
  • LocationDurbanville

Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:37

View PostTavis82, on 02 September 2011 - 12:26 , said:

That's a really good weight for a Shova.  :thumbup:

Yup. Light enough to climb at a lekker rate and strong enough to bomb down the ruff stuff. Perfect. My Zula is actually fulfilling the trail bike role at the moment!

#314 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:47

View PostXTC1, on 02 September 2011 - 11:47 , said:

Chubba how about a ride report and how are you enjoying that bike compared to the Zula?
Firstly i would have to say it is a LOT more forgiving and comfortable then the Zula. When you loose it on the Zula, which is easy, it bites you.

The riding position on the Shova is a lot slacker, more travel and plusher ride. I also find I use my hamstrings a lot more, which means my legs are not as tired and I have been climbing better. I do find that the shock has a lot more play due to the HV can, so there is more pedal bob even with propedal on therefore loss of efficiency.  

I have been playing with the fork as it is adjustable 120-150, so on climbs I take it to 120. Even at this height I have been struggling with pulling the front wheel up on steep short inclines due to the steeper angle, but this just needs a bit of learning on my side.

Going down, I can adjust the fork to 150 on the fly and it has made a huge difference, so too has the seating position. I now feel “in the bike” and not perched on top of it like the Zula.  It eats single track, flowing over bumps, ruts and roots and definitely gives you more confidence. I think the fact my weight distribution is better and that I now feel part of the bike, has given me more confidence to move my weight around to better control corners, drop offs and the technical stuff. (Still want to learn to jump.)

The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.

#315 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:49

View Postbanna, on 02 September 2011 - 12:37 , said:

Yup. Light enough to climb at a lekker rate and strong enough to bomb down the ruff stuff. Perfect. My Zula is actually fulfilling the trail bike role at the moment!
And the Intense?

#316 banna

banna

    Pancy Ass

  • Members
  • 935 posts
  • LocationDurbanville

Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:56

View PostChubba, on 02 September 2011 - 12:47 , said:


The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.

Interesting comments Chubba. I find that in smooth singeltrack (i.e. Majik forest) my Zula is quicker than my Intense, but as soon as it gets rocky, rooty etc (i.e. Jonkershoek) the Intense will put light years over the Zula. So ja, horses for courses. And nice to have 2 very different bikes.

#317 banna

banna

    Pancy Ass

  • Members
  • 935 posts
  • LocationDurbanville

Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:58

View PostChubba, on 02 September 2011 - 12:49 , said:

And the Intense?

The Intense is fulfilling the all important AM role ! But ja, I'm also still learning the tricks and trades of jumping, so at the moment the rider is holding the steed back!

#318 Chubba

Chubba

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2 950 posts
  • LocationKippie Town

Posted 02 September 2011 - 01:00

View Postbanna, on 02 September 2011 - 12:56 , said:

Interesting comments Chubba. I find that in smooth singeltrack (i.e. Majik forest) my Zula is quicker than my Intense, but as soon as it gets rocky, rooty etc (i.e. Jonkershoek) the Intense will put light years over the Zula. So ja, horses for courses. And nice to have 2 very different bikes.
Yes, that’s what I meant, sorry if I did not convey it properly. Zula is very good on smooth stuff, but more travel is nicer on trickier paths.

#319 banna

banna

    Pancy Ass

  • Members
  • 935 posts
  • LocationDurbanville

Posted 02 September 2011 - 01:06

View PostChubba, on 02 September 2011 - 01:00 , said:

Yes, that’s what I meant, sorry if I did not convey it properly. Zula is very good on smooth stuff, but more travel is nicer on trickier paths.

:thumbup:

#320 Nobody

Nobody

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 1 042 posts
  • LocationWestern Cape

Posted 02 September 2011 - 01:58

View PostChubba, on 02 September 2011 - 12:47 , said:

Firstly i would have to say it is a LOT more forgiving and comfortable then the Zula. When you loose it on the Zula, which is easy, it bites you.

The riding position on the Shova is a lot slacker, more travel and plusher ride. I also find I use my hamstrings a lot more, which means my legs are not as tired and I have been climbing better. I do find that the shock has a lot more play due to the HV can, so there is more pedal bob even with propedal on therefore loss of efficiency.  

I have been playing with the fork as it is adjustable 120-150, so on climbs I take it to 120. Even at this height I have been struggling with pulling the front wheel up on steep short inclines due to the steeper angle, but this just needs a bit of learning on my side.

Going down, I can adjust the fork to 150 on the fly and it has made a huge difference, so too has the seating position. I now feel “in the bike” and not perched on top of it like the Zula.  It eats single track, flowing over bumps, ruts and roots and definitely gives you more confidence. I think the fact my weight distribution is better and that I now feel part of the bike, has given me more confidence to move my weight around to better control corners, drop offs and the technical stuff. (Still want to learn to jump.)

The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.

Watch and repeat
http://www.pinkbike....me-Voltage.html