Let's see those Morewoods...
Started by The Crow, May 19 2009 01:20
395 replies to this topic
Post Order
#305
Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:17
#306
Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:31
Either a Shova or an Mbuzi will be the next morewood I plan on adding to my stable
"black rims are for poor people"
- Meredith & van Luipen
- Meredith & van Luipen
#307
#309
Posted 02 September 2011 - 11:47
Chubba how about a ride report and how are you enjoying that bike compared to the Zula?
#310
#312
Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:26
That's a really good weight for a Shova.

2010 Santa Cruz Blur LT
2008 Santa Cruz Superlight
2011 Niner E.M.D
#314
Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:47
XTC1, on 02 September 2011 - 11:47 , said:
Chubba how about a ride report and how are you enjoying that bike compared to the Zula?
The riding position on the Shova is a lot slacker, more travel and plusher ride. I also find I use my hamstrings a lot more, which means my legs are not as tired and I have been climbing better. I do find that the shock has a lot more play due to the HV can, so there is more pedal bob even with propedal on therefore loss of efficiency.
I have been playing with the fork as it is adjustable 120-150, so on climbs I take it to 120. Even at this height I have been struggling with pulling the front wheel up on steep short inclines due to the steeper angle, but this just needs a bit of learning on my side.
Going down, I can adjust the fork to 150 on the fly and it has made a huge difference, so too has the seating position. I now feel “in the bike” and not perched on top of it like the Zula. It eats single track, flowing over bumps, ruts and roots and definitely gives you more confidence. I think the fact my weight distribution is better and that I now feel part of the bike, has given me more confidence to move my weight around to better control corners, drop offs and the technical stuff. (Still want to learn to jump.)
The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.
#316
Posted 02 September 2011 - 12:56
Chubba, on 02 September 2011 - 12:47 , said:
The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.
Interesting comments Chubba. I find that in smooth singeltrack (i.e. Majik forest) my Zula is quicker than my Intense, but as soon as it gets rocky, rooty etc (i.e. Jonkershoek) the Intense will put light years over the Zula. So ja, horses for courses. And nice to have 2 very different bikes.
#318
Posted 02 September 2011 - 01:00
banna, on 02 September 2011 - 12:56 , said:
Interesting comments Chubba. I find that in smooth singeltrack (i.e. Majik forest) my Zula is quicker than my Intense, but as soon as it gets rocky, rooty etc (i.e. Jonkershoek) the Intense will put light years over the Zula. So ja, horses for courses. And nice to have 2 very different bikes.
#320
Posted 02 September 2011 - 01:58
Chubba, on 02 September 2011 - 12:47 , said:
Firstly i would have to say it is a LOT more forgiving and comfortable then the Zula. When you loose it on the Zula, which is easy, it bites you.
The riding position on the Shova is a lot slacker, more travel and plusher ride. I also find I use my hamstrings a lot more, which means my legs are not as tired and I have been climbing better. I do find that the shock has a lot more play due to the HV can, so there is more pedal bob even with propedal on therefore loss of efficiency.
I have been playing with the fork as it is adjustable 120-150, so on climbs I take it to 120. Even at this height I have been struggling with pulling the front wheel up on steep short inclines due to the steeper angle, but this just needs a bit of learning on my side.
Going down, I can adjust the fork to 150 on the fly and it has made a huge difference, so too has the seating position. I now feel “in the bike” and not perched on top of it like the Zula. It eats single track, flowing over bumps, ruts and roots and definitely gives you more confidence. I think the fact my weight distribution is better and that I now feel part of the bike, has given me more confidence to move my weight around to better control corners, drop offs and the technical stuff. (Still want to learn to jump.)
The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.
The riding position on the Shova is a lot slacker, more travel and plusher ride. I also find I use my hamstrings a lot more, which means my legs are not as tired and I have been climbing better. I do find that the shock has a lot more play due to the HV can, so there is more pedal bob even with propedal on therefore loss of efficiency.
I have been playing with the fork as it is adjustable 120-150, so on climbs I take it to 120. Even at this height I have been struggling with pulling the front wheel up on steep short inclines due to the steeper angle, but this just needs a bit of learning on my side.
Going down, I can adjust the fork to 150 on the fly and it has made a huge difference, so too has the seating position. I now feel “in the bike” and not perched on top of it like the Zula. It eats single track, flowing over bumps, ruts and roots and definitely gives you more confidence. I think the fact my weight distribution is better and that I now feel part of the bike, has given me more confidence to move my weight around to better control corners, drop offs and the technical stuff. (Still want to learn to jump.)
The Zula is an XC bike and for long rides, with easier terrain, I think it’s the way to go. It is efficient, smooth and fast.
If you want to have fun and comfort the Shova is fantastic. I can say I am a convert and very happy with the change. I have also come to realize, I am not that interested in being a race snake and riding XC for 60 -90kms. I want to have fun, and the Shova delivers that.
Watch and repeat
http://www.pinkbike....me-Voltage.html












