to have more time for cycling. Will they not suffer from "burn-out"
before they are 20yrs old? I think Burry did it as well as John-Lee
Augustein. I know that Rorke Croeser and Caitlin de Wet are currently
doing it.
Posted 20 June 2008 - 03:06
Posted 20 June 2008 - 03:48
Posted 20 June 2008 - 03:57
9 out of 10 youngsters stop at age 19 or 20. Home schooled or not. Nothing wrong with a normal school, you can train from 2 to 6pm. More than enough time. Let me repeat that....they dont need more time, they must concentrate on speed, not endurance. (I'm no Coach) The podium at the junior world mtb, the riders that played with Rourke, are the same 3 riders that filled the podium at the junior cyclocros worlds! Thomes Frischnecht once said the reason why he likes MTB racing, is because the starts are so much slower. They are faster, bottom line. The race is only about 90min. Track racing will also help.
Posted 20 June 2008 - 04:07
Posted 21 June 2008 - 12:50
110% with Groot Lem.
It comes down to the question everytime: Is it the parent's ambition or the talented youngster??????
Posted 21 June 2008 - 12:52
Posted 21 June 2008 - 02:43
I am all for finishing school - this was also the route chosen in our home, BUT these are the realities:
on the cycling side they will be competing against individuals who have daily trained 5 to 6 hours and on the academic side the lost hours (also because of travelling and away weekends) are mmm... easily seen.
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:18
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:22
Quote
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:27
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:31
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:34
Quote




Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:36
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:38
Quote
Posted 21 June 2008 - 03:50
Posted 21 June 2008 - 04:03