Silverback Storm 1.0 vs Storm 2.0? Advise
#1
Posted 11 August 2012 - 03:25
#2
Posted 11 August 2012 - 03:34
The sid is lighter and stiffer as well as more responsive in my opinion. The reba is plusher as I think it makes more use of the travel and is quite a reliable fork that does not have to be serviced as freuently as a fox or sid, however, I would still go with the sid. Its just far more respnsive. As for the groupset, there is a reason xt is the most popular goupset. Especially when it comes to the rear deraileur, slx will suck plus the slx cranks scratches like a b*#t&$. For R3000 extra you will feel a noticeable difference and I thus highly reccomend the storm 1.0
#3
Posted 11 August 2012 - 03:46
This post might not be very informative but just stating that I'm a happy customer.
#4
Posted 14 August 2012 - 03:17
#5
Posted 14 August 2012 - 07:12
Cervelo101, on 11 August 2012 - 03:34 , said:
The sid is lighter and stiffer as well as more responsive in my opinion. The reba is plusher as I think it makes more use of the travel and is quite a reliable fork that does not have to be serviced as freuently as a fox or sid, however, I would still go with the sid. Its just far more respnsive. As for the groupset, there is a reason xt is the most popular goupset. Especially when it comes to the rear deraileur, slx will suck plus the slx cranks scratches like a b*#t&$. For R3000 extra you will feel a noticeable difference and I thus highly reccomend the storm 1.0
Partly Wrong... Internals of the sid and the reba are the same. Only difference between the 2 models is the weight, and then the difference isn't that great. I would actually say that the Reba is the better fork for the majority of riders as the extra weight lends it extra stiffness over the sid. Yes, the sid is favoured by racers but that's due to the 100g or so weight savings over the Reba. In fact, I'd prefer to have the Reba as it is a truly "do it all" fork.
As for the slx gruppo, that's absolute hogwash. Slx kit is fantastic, and more than sufficient for the job. In fact, slx in some cases is preferable over xt, and last years slx crank was actually stiffer than the xt one... In terms of difference to xt, yes there is a slight weight difference but that is insignificant. It's certainly not worth the extra 3k.
My advice is to pocket the difference and instead get something else like an hr monitor or snazzy helmet or new kit.
Edited by cptmayhem, 14 August 2012 - 07:14 .
Baby Mayhem is here!
Un-tatted tat lover
#6
Posted 14 August 2012 - 07:30
Edited by Berg Bok, 14 August 2012 - 07:31 .
#7
Posted 14 August 2012 - 07:58
Do people who cant ride bikes find the saying ,'it just like riding a bike' , offensive ?
#8
Posted 14 August 2012 - 08:01
Berg Bok, on 14 August 2012 - 07:30 , said:
Ja, they are - but they're pretty much exactly the same as the SLX brakes, save for a few grams difference. The rotors, however... oooooooh....
Baby Mayhem is here!
Un-tatted tat lover
#9
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:26
#10
Posted 14 August 2012 - 09:39
#11
Posted 26 August 2012 - 08:35
So i ended up going for the Storm 1.0. The shiny XT and SID got the best of me! haha! Got it on fri eve and Saturday was way too rainy so took it to Tokai this afternoon(not much less rainy and wet anyway and wow what an amazing ride!!!! I've been on an alu, dual-sus, 26er and I cannot even compare two! I flew up hill that I normally break a sweat on and the two rings intead of three didnt seem to hinder me as there was such an increased power transfer to the real wheel with no rear shock to dampen it. The SID was a little soft but I just need to get a shock pump and get it to the right pressure. Rode it home after on the road and I swear it felt better than my road bike. I'm sure the Storm 2.0 would have been just as amazing but don't regret the few extra k.
Thanks for all the advice guys!
Lyle
#12
Posted 26 August 2012 - 08:51
cptmayhem, on 14 August 2012 - 07:12 , said:
As for the slx gruppo, that's absolute hogwash. Slx kit is fantastic, and more than sufficient for the job. In fact, slx in some cases is preferable over xt, and last years slx crank was actually stiffer than the xt one... In terms of difference to xt, yes there is a slight weight difference but that is insignificant. It's certainly not worth the extra 3k.
My advice is to pocket the difference and instead get something else like an hr monitor or snazzy helmet or new kit.
#13
Posted 26 August 2012 - 09:01
Lylo, on 26 August 2012 - 08:35 , said:
So i ended up going for the Storm 1.0. The shiny XT and SID got the best of me! haha! Got it on fri eve and Saturday was way too rainy so took it to Tokai this afternoon(not much less rainy and wet anyway and wow what an amazing ride!!!! I've been on an alu, dual-sus, 26er and I cannot even compare two! I flew up hill that I normally break a sweat on and the two rings intead of three didnt seem to hinder me as there was such an increased power transfer to the real wheel with no rear shock to dampen it. The SID was a little soft but I just need to get a shock pump and get it to the right pressure. Rode it home after on the road and I swear it felt better than my road bike. I'm sure the Storm 2.0 would have been just as amazing but don't regret the few extra k.
Thanks for all the advice guys!
Lyle
Told you it is good! Now imagine mine with American Classic Race wheels and Ritchey WCS tyres, with other minor upgrades sub 10kgs. Normally the false hilltops in Grabouw made me swear, 1st time I took the Storm out there, I swore at the false hilltop like normal, only to realize it was in fact the top.
Keep in mind that the Rockshox need much more air than Fox. Look at left lower rear tube of the shock, there you should find a kg=>psi chart.
#14
Posted 27 August 2012 - 02:19
#15
Posted 27 August 2012 - 02:25
#16
Posted 06 September 2012 - 06:23













