I have the option of getting one of the following bikes -price is the same for both. The 29er is 2.3kg's heavier than the 26'er .... is the advantage of the larger wheels worth the extra weight?
Bike details are:
26'er full carbon 9.8kg's. X0 throughout with Easton EC90 stem, bars, post etc
29'er ally 12.1kg's. mix of X0/X9/X7 with Easton EA bars, stem, etc
Both are full suspension and forks and shock are similar.
Both are good brands ... let's not get caught up in brand loyalty
Bike will be used for the usual stage racing stuff (Sani, W2W, possibly Epic next year). I'm a middle of the bunch type rider (3:10 Argus), so not looking for podiums with the thing. My usual riding is Tokai, Deer Park, etc ... in other words very little flat riding, mostly up-and-down stuff.
Comments? thoughts?















