Jump to content


Is the extra weight of a 29'er worth it?


19 replies to this topic Post Order

#1 DaleE

    Domestique

  • Members
  • 54 posts
  • LocationCape Town

Posted 03 February 2012 - 03:56

Ok, so without trying to start (another) "29ers are the best thing since sliced bread" thread, the question is like this:

I have the option of getting one of the following bikes -price is the same for both. The 29er is 2.3kg's heavier than the 26'er .... is the advantage of the larger wheels worth the extra weight?

Bike details are:
26'er full carbon 9.8kg's. X0 throughout with Easton EC90 stem, bars, post etc
29'er ally 12.1kg's. mix of X0/X9/X7 with Easton EA bars, stem, etc
Both are full suspension and forks and shock are similar.
Both are good brands ... let's not get caught up in brand loyalty :)

Bike will be used for the usual stage racing stuff (Sani, W2W, possibly Epic next year). I'm a middle of the bunch type rider (3:10 Argus), so not looking for podiums with the thing. My usual riding is Tokai, Deer Park, etc ... in other words very little flat riding, mostly up-and-down stuff.

Comments? thoughts?

#2 RooiWIllie

    Champion Hubber

  • Members
  • 310 posts
  • LocationCenturion

Posted 03 February 2012 - 04:51

I have been contemplating the same... But with the extra weight, and debatable handling... I'll stick to 26.
I don't have something cool to post here... Import this, won that and some sour comment about "yo mama is so phat..." I just ride my bike...

#3 johannrissik

    Champion Hubber

  • Members
  • 310 posts
  • LocationKaroo

Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:03

No, I think you should go for something with 650b. That way you'd be saved this awful dilemma ;)

#4 TNT1

    Bob

  • Forum Managers
  • 23,681 posts
  • Location/b/

Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:05

View PostDaleE, on 03 February 2012 - 03:56 , said:



Bike details are:
26'er full carbon 9.8kg's.
29'er ally 12.1kg's.


Comparing apples with oranges, mate.
Seems kinda meaningless.

#5 eccentric1

    Hubber since August 2004

  • Forum Managers
  • 3,591 posts
  • LocationPretoria

Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:39

View Postjohannrissik, on 03 February 2012 - 05:03 , said:

No, I think you should go for something with 650b. That way you'd be saved this awful dilemma ;)

Please explain the difference between a 650b and a 26" wheel or rim
Good being home

#6 eccentric1

    Hubber since August 2004

  • Forum Managers
  • 3,591 posts
  • LocationPretoria

Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:40

To the OP....... According to the Cult of the Weenie Measurers AKA twentie naainers it is better.
Good being home

#7 Ricky Bobby

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 2,496 posts
  • LocationSunninghill

Posted 03 February 2012 - 05:51

DaleE. Let me put it another way. How much do you weigh? If you are above say 86kg don't be bothered about the weight of the bike since the extra kg's wont really make a difference and cutting beer from your diet will save you loads and loads of ZARS and reduce your weight. If you weigh less than 70kg's go for the lighter one. My personal yard stick so no science or anything involved there so spare me the flaming. I moved from a light 26" HT Spez to a 29" Niner RIP 9 and in all honesty I'm more comfortable on the heavier bike and the increase in weight is not that noticeable. I weigh a beefy 91kg's and do mostly the type of riding you do (ie long hours in the saddle, hence comfort is king). First and foremost find out what works for you and buy accordingly.
Quiero ir rápido!

#8 johannrissik

    Champion Hubber

  • Members
  • 310 posts
  • LocationKaroo

Posted 03 February 2012 - 06:37

View Posteccentric1, on 03 February 2012 - 05:39 , said:

Please explain the difference between a 650b and a 26" wheel or rim

I'll let these guys do the hexplainin' http://mtbtires.com/...275q-tire-specs because I'm happy with my wheelsize.

Edited by johannrissik, 03 February 2012 - 06:38 .


#9 ramsew

    Domestique

  • Members
  • 140 posts
  • LocationCape Town

Posted 03 February 2012 - 06:47

View PostDaleE, on 03 February 2012 - 03:56 , said:

Ok, so without trying to start (another) "29ers are the best thing since sliced bread" thread, the question is like this:

I have the option of getting one of the following bikes -price is the same for both. The 29er is 2.3kg's heavier than the 26'er .... is the advantage of the larger wheels worth the extra weight?

Bike details are:
26'er full carbon 9.8kg's. X0 throughout with Easton EC90 stem, bars, post etc
29'er ally 12.1kg's. mix of X0/X9/X7 with Easton EA bars, stem, etc
Both are full suspension and forks and shock are similar.
Both are good brands ... let's not get caught up in brand loyalty :)

Bike will be used for the usual stage racing stuff (Sani, W2W, possibly Epic next year). I'm a middle of the bunch type rider (3:10 Argus), so not looking for podiums with the thing. My usual riding is Tokai, Deer Park, etc ... in other words very little flat riding, mostly up-and-down stuff.

Comments? thoughts?



#10 DaleE

    Domestique

  • Members
  • 54 posts
  • LocationCape Town

Posted 03 February 2012 - 10:08

View PostTNT1, on 03 February 2012 - 05:05 , said:

Comparing apples with oranges, mate.
Seems kinda meaningless.

I don't think so. Both are full suspension and will do the same job. The choose of frame material is irrelevant apart from the weight .... or am I missing something here?

#11 DaleE

    Domestique

  • Members
  • 54 posts
  • LocationCape Town

Posted 03 February 2012 - 10:11

View PostRicky Bobby, on 03 February 2012 - 05:51 , said:

How much do you weigh?

77kg's and 1.73m .... so not the largest rider. I think that the 29'ers have improved a lot in terms of geometry, so they're not limited to the taller riders anymore.
Your comments on comfort and hours in the saddle make lots of sense.

#12 Eldron

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 4,171 posts
  • LocationJohannesburg

Posted 03 February 2012 - 10:41

If you're getting a 26" carbon with XO for the same price as an alu 29" with X9 or X7 then either you're getting a great deal on the 26 or you're being ripped for the 29.

In this case I would go 26 - much better deal! Wheelsize is irrelevant when comparing those specs.

Or do some more investigation - the value difference should not be that big between 26 and 29.
Team Lake Kre Alkalyn - "cycling with a conscience"

#13 arendoog

    Domestique

  • Members
  • 152 posts
  • LocationPRETORIA

Posted 03 February 2012 - 10:41

you are not the biggest rider,so weight plays a role here.I would go for a 26 dual suss or a 29 HT.I have a 29 duel suss ,but i weigh 99kg..29 Ht with tubeless tyres at 1.8bar ride smooth anyway.I had to choose the same for my daughter that is exacly the same hight and weightas you .She rides a 29 medium HT with x9 and i struggle to keep up.For comfort i would then go for 26 duel sus

#14 TNT1

    Bob

  • Forum Managers
  • 23,681 posts
  • Location/b/

Posted 04 February 2012 - 07:23

View PostDaleE, on 03 February 2012 - 10:08 , said:

The choose of frame material is irrelevant apart from the weight .... or am I missing something here?

But you are asking about the weight difference. How is it irrelevant?

#15 King_Crispy

    Ultimate Hubber

  • Members
  • 739 posts

Posted 04 February 2012 - 07:50

Buy a decent 26" full suss bike and then when 27.5" wheels become mainstream next year you can convert and be ahead of the "new" wave that will speep across mountainbiking.
The conversion should consist of buying the new wheels and getting rid of the old ones. Easy peasy

#16 DaleE

    Domestique

  • Members
  • 54 posts
  • LocationCape Town

Posted 04 February 2012 - 06:01

View PostEldron, on 03 February 2012 - 10:41 , said:

If you're getting a 26" carbon with XO for the same price as an alu 29" with X9 or X7 then either you're getting a great deal on the 26 or you're being ripped for the 29.

The 26'er is a 2011 model and last one in the shop, so selling it off at a huge discount .... and that's why its at the same price point as the ally bike.
Have shopped around a bit ... price on the 29'er are on par with similar spec'ed bikes from other brands.